Signaling Load Reduction in 5G Network and Beyond
Engineering and Technology Journal,
2021, Volume 39, Issue 10, Pages 1481-1491
AbstractA huge traffic flow in the next generation network is anticipated due to the rising in number of users and the new services that need low end-to-end latency causing a large signaling load on the Core Network (CN). In order to mitigate this issue, many revolutionary architectures have been proposed to reduce this burden such as Cloud Radio Access Network (C-RAN). In this paper, a new C-RAN distributed core network architecture has been proposed by splitting some CN functions and grouping them into one location with Base Band Units (BBUs). As a measure of testing the proposed architectures and by using the MATLAB, the number of signaling messages processed by the control entities was analyzed. The evaluation results indicate a significant improvement if it have been compared to Long Term Evolution (LTE) architecture in terms of signaling load reduction, As the average signaling load was reduced by 46.04 percent in one of the proposed architectures when the number of user equipments increased.
- The number of messages has been reduced in the proposed architecture as compared with the previous related works.
- The signaling load in the Long Term Evolution was reduced by 45.4% when taking into consideration the area size.
- The signaling load in the Long Term Evolution was reduced by 38.3% when analyzing the User Equipment velocity.
- The signaling load in the Long Term Evolution was reduced by 46.04% when taking into consideration the User Equipment number.
 D. Wu, H. Shi, H. Wang, R. Wang, and H. Fang, A feature-based learning system for internet of things applications, IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 6 (2018) 1928–1937.
 Z. Zhang and L. Wang, Social tie-driven content priority scheme for d2d communications, Information Sciences, 480 (2019), 160–173.
 P. Zhang, X. Kang, Y. Liu, and H. Yang, Cooperative willingness aware collaborative caching mechanism towards cellular d2d communication, IEEE Access, 6 (2018) 046–67056.
 D. Wu, Q. Liu, H. Wang, Q. Yang, and R. Wang, Cache less for more: Exploiting cooperative video caching and delivery in d2d communications, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 21 (2018)1788–1798.
 S. S. Jaffer, A. Hussain, M. A. Qureshi, and W. S. Khawaja, Towards the shifting of 5g front haul traffic on passive optical network,Wireless Personal Communications, 112 (2020), 1549–1568.
 A. Virdis, G. Stea, D. Sabella, and M. Caretti, A practical framework for energy-efficient node activation in heterogeneous lte networks, Mobile Information Systems, (2017).
 J. Gozalvez, Tentative 3gpp timeline for 5g [mobile radio], IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine, 10 (2015) 12–18.
 S. Sicari, A. Rizzardi, and A. Coen-Porisini, 5g in the internet of things era: An overview on security and privacy challenges, Computer Networks, 179 (2020) 107345.
 T.-Y. Wu, Z. Lee, M. S. Obaidat, S. Kumari, S. Kumar, and C.-M. Chen, An authenticated key exchange protocol for multi-server architecture in 5g networks, IEEE Access, 8 (2020) 096–28 108.
 J. H. Kim, 6g and internet of things: a survey, Journal of Management Analytics, (2021) 1–17.
 P. Varga, J. Peto, A. Franko, D. Balla, D. Haja, F. Janky, G. Soos,D. Ficzere, M. Maliosz, and L. Toka, 5g support for industrial iotapplications–challenges, solutions, and research gaps,Sensors, 20 (2020) 828.
 D. Chandramouli, R. Liebhart, and J. Pirskanen, 5G for the Connected World. John Wiley & Sons, (2019).
 J. P. Shim, M. Avital, A. R. Dennis, M. Rossi, C. Sørensen, and A. French, The transformative effect of the internet of things on business and society, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 44 (2019) 5.
 M. Presser, Q. Zhang, A. Bechmann, and M. J. Beliatis, The internet of things as driver for digital business model innovation, in Digital Business Models. Springer, (2019) 27–55.
 H. E. Yılmaz, A. Sirel, and M. F. Esen, The impact of internet of things self-security on daily business and business continuity, in Handbook of research on cloud computing and big data applications in IoT.IGI Global, (2019) 481–498.
 A. Raschendorfer, B. M ̈orzinger, E. Steinberger, P. Pelzmann, R. Oswald, M. Stadler, and F. Bleicher, On iota as a potential enabler for an m2m economy in manufacturing, Procedia CIRP, 79 (2019) 379–384.
 K. David and H. Berndt, 6g vision and requirements: Is there any need for beyond 5g? IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine, 13 (2018) 72–80.
 F. Tariq, M. R. Khandaker, K.-K. Wong, M. A. Imran, M. Bennis, and M. Debbah, A speculative study on 6g,IEEE Wireless Communications, 27 (2020) 118–125.
 G. E. Gonc ̧alves, G. L. Santos, L. Ferreira, ́E. d. S. Rocha, L. M. de Souza, A. L. Moreira, J. Kelner, and D. Sadok, Flying to the clouds: The evolution of the 5g radio access networks, in The Cloud-to-Thing Continuum. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, (2020) 41–60.
 M. Series, Minimum requirements related to technical performance for imt-2020 radio interface (s), Report (2017) 2410-0.
 A. R. Bahai, B. R. Saltzberg, and M. Ergen, Multi-carrier digital communications: theory and applications of OFDM. Springer Science & Business Media, 2004.
 D. Wu, Z. Zhang, S. Wu, J. Yang, and R. Wang, Biologically inspired resource allocation for network slices in 5g-enabled internet of things, IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 6, (2018) 9266–9279.
 Y. Cai, F. R. Yu, and S. Bu, Dynamic operations of cloud radio access networks (c-ran) for mobile cloud computing systems, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 65 (2015) 1536–1548.
 M. Peng, Y. Sun, X. Li, Z. Mao, and C. Wang, Recent advances in cloud radio access networks: System architectures, key techniques, and open issues, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 18 (2016) 2282–2308.
 N. Gupta, S. Sharma, P. K. Juneja, and U. Garg, Sdnfv 5g-iot: A framework for the next generation 5g enabled iot,in 2020 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication & Materials (ICACCM). IEEE, (2020) 289–294.
 R. Shah, V. Kumar, M. Vutukuru, and P. Kulkarni, Turboepc: Leveraging dataplane programmability to accelerate the mobile packet core, in Proceedings of the Symposium on SDN Research, (2020) 83–95.
 J. Cho, R. Stutsman, and J. Van der Merwe, Mobilestream: a scalable, programmable and evolvable mobile core control plane platform, in Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on emerging Networking EXperiments and Technologies, (2018) 293–306.
 Z. A. Qazi, M. Walls, A. Panda, V. Sekar, S. Ratnasamy, and S. Shenker, A high performance packet core for next generation cellular networks, in Proceedings of the Conference of the ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication, (2017) 348–361.
 T. Sasidhar, V. Havisha, S. Koushik, M. Deep, VK. Reddy, Load Balancing Techniques for Efficient Traffic Management in Cloud Environment, International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE), 6 (2016) 963-973.
 S. Potluri and K. Subba Rao, Quality of Service based Task Scheduling Algorithms in Cloud Computing, International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE), 7 (2017) 1088.
 X. An, F. Pianese, I. Widjaja, and U. G. Acer, Dmme: A distributed lte mobility management entity, Bell Labs Technical Journal, 17 (2012) 97–120.
 M. Pozza, Solving signaling storms in lte networks: A software-defined cellular architecture, (2016).
 S. B. H. Said, M. R. Sama, K. Guillouard, L. Suciu, G. Simon, X. Lagrange, and J.-M. Bonnin, New control plane in 3gpp lte/epc architecture for on-demand connectivity service, in 2013 IEEE 2nd international conference on cloud networking (CloudNet). IEEE, (2013) 205–209.
 M. R. Sama, S. B. H. Said, K. Guillouard, and L. Suciu, Enabling network programmability in lte/epc architecture using openflow, in 2014 12th International Symposium on Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc, and Wireless Networks (WiOpt). IEEE, (2014) 389–396.
 V.-G. Nguyen and Y. Kim, Proposal and evaluation of sdn-based mobile packet core networks, EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2015 (2015) 172.
 I. Al-Samman, A. Doufexi, and M. Beach, A c-ran architecture for lte control signalling, in 2016 IEEE 83rd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring). IEEE, (2016) 1–5.
 I. Al-Samman, A. Doufexi, and M. Beach, A proposal for hybrid sdn c-ran architectures for enhancing control signaling under mobility, in 2016 IEEE 84th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC-Fall).IEEE, (2016) 1–6.
 Widjaja, P. Bosch, and H. La Roche, Comparison of mme signaling loads for long-term-evolution architectures, in 2009 IEEE 70th Vehicular Technology Conference Fall. IEEE, (2009).
- Article View: 94
- PDF Download: 92