The Effect of Infill Pattern on Tensile Strength of PLA Material in Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) Process
Engineering and Technology Journal,
2022, Volume 40, Issue 12, Pages 1723-1730
AbstractFused deposition modeling (FDM) is an additive manufacturing (AM) process often used to build geometrically complex prototypes and parts. It is becoming more popular since it improves products by eliminating the need for high-priced equipment. Materials, printing methods, and printing variables all impact the mechanical characteristics of printed items. The process parameters of FDM affect the parts' quality and functionality. This study examines the influence of different infill patterns on test specimens made of polylactic acid (PLA) tensile strength. Total of 10 different infill patterns (IPs): Grid, Lines, Triangles, Tri-Hexagon, Cubic, Gyroid, Zig-zag, Concentric, Octet, and Cubic subdivision were taken as process variables. Samples were printed using processing parameters (speed 60 mm/s, layer height 0.1 mm, infill density 80%, extruded at 200◦C). The ASTM D638 tensile test was used to determine the tensile strength based on this printing parameter. According to tensile test results, the infill pattern significantly affects the tensile strength. The results showed that the concentric infill pattern has a higher tensile strength of 32.174 MPa, whereas the triangles infill pattern has a lower tensile strength of 20.934 MPa.
- Ten different types of infill patterns were used.
- The concentric infill pattern has a higher effect.
- The triangles infill pattern has a lower effect.
 S. Fafenrot, N. Grimmelsmann, M. Wortmann, and A. Ehrmann, Three-dimensional (3D) printing of polymer-metal hybrid materials by fused deposition modeling, Materials ,10 (2017) 1199. doi: 10.3390/ma10101199
 S. M. Ahmad and S. Y. Ezdeen, Effect of coating on the specific properties and damping loss factor of ultem 1010, Zanco J. Pure Appl. Sci. 33 (2021) 105–116. doi: 10.21271/ZJPAS.33.2.10
 T. Abbas, F. M. Othman, and H. B. Ali, Effect of infill Parameter on compression property in FDM Process, dimensions 12 (2017) 24–25. doi: 10.9790/9622-0710021619
 F. A. Naser and M. T. Rashid, The Influence of Concave Pectoral Fin Morphology in The Performance of Labriform Swimming Robot, Iraqi J. Electr. Electron. Eng. 16 (2020) 54–61. doi: 10.37917/ijeee.16.1.7
 N. A. Aldeen, B. A. Sadkhan, and B. Owaid, Hand bone orthosis manufacturing using 3d printing technology, J. Eng. Sustain. Dev. 24 (2020) 451–458. doi: 10.31272/jeasd.conf.1.50
 M. Rismalia, S. C. Hidajat, I. G. R. Permana, B. Hadisujoto, M. Muslimin, and F. Triawan, Infill pattern and density effects on the tensile properties of 3D printed PLA material, in Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1402 (2019) 44041. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1402/4/044041
 F. M. Mwema and E. T. Akinlabi, Fused Deposition Modeling: Strategies for Quality Enhancement. Springer Nature, 2020.
 W. A. Soud, I. A. Baqer, and M. R. Ahmed, Experimental Study of 3D printing Density Effect on the Mechanical Properties of the Carbon-Fiber and Polylactic Acid Specimens, Eng. Technol. J. 37 (2019) 128–132. doi: 10.30684/etj.37.4A.3.
 F. M. Othman, T. Fadhil, and A. H. B. Ali, Influence of process parameters on mechanical properties and printing time of FDM PLA printed parts using design of experiment, J. Eng. Res. 8 (2018) 2248–9622. doi: 10.9790/9622-080702656965
 R. Srinivasan, K. N. Kumar, A. J. Ibrahim, K. V Anandu, and R. Gurudhevan, Impact of fused deposition process parameter (infill pattern) on the strength of PETG part, Mater. Today Proc. 27 (2020) 1801–1805. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.777
 B. Huang, S. Meng, H. He, Y. Jia, Y. Xu, and H. Huang, Study of processing parameters in fused deposition modeling based on mechanical properties of acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene filament, Polym. Eng. Sci. 59 (2019) 120–128. doi: 10.1002/pen.24875
 M. Lalegani Dezaki and M. K. A. Mohd Ariffin, The Effects of Combined Infill Patterns on Mechanical Properties in FDM Process, Polymers 12 (2020) 2792. doi: 10.3390/polym12122792.
 L. Baich, G. Manogharan, and H. Marie, Study of infill print design on production cost-time of 3D printed ABS parts, Int. J. Rapid Manuf. 5 (2015) 308. doi: 10.1504/IJRAPIDM.2015.074809.
 D. Farbman and C. McCoy, Materials testing of 3D printed ABS and PLA samples to guide mechanical design, in International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference, 49903, 2016, V002T01A015. doi: 10.1115/MSEC2016-8668
 M. Fernandez-vicente, W. Calle, S. Ferrándiz, and A. Conejero, Effect of Infill Parameters on Tensile Mechanical Behavior in Desktop 3D Printing, 3D Print. Addit. Manuf. 3 (2016) 183–192. doi: 10.1089/3dp.2015.0036.
 E. Cho, H. Hein, Z. Lynn, S. Hla, and T. Tran, Investigation on Influence of Infill Pattern and Layer Thickness on Mechanical Strength of PLA Material in 3D Printing Technology, J. Eng. Sci. Res. 3 (2019) 27–37. doi: 10.26666/rmp.jesr.2019.2.5.
 A. Pandžić, D. Hodžić, and E. Kadrić, Experimental Investigation on Influence of Infill Density on Tensile Mechanical Properties of Different FDM 3D Printed Materials, parameters 3 (2021) 4. doi: 10.18421/TEM103-25
 American Society for Testing and Materials, ASTM D638-14, Standard Practice for Preparation of Metallographic Specimens, ASTM Int. 82 (2016) 1–15. doi: 10.1520/D0638-14.1.
 Y. F. Buys, A. N. A. Aznan, and H. Anuar, Mechanical properties, morphology, and hydrolytic degradation behavior of polylactic acid/natural rubber blends, in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 290 (2018) 12077. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/290/1/012077
 H. K. Dave, N. H. Patadiya, A. R. Prajapati, and S. R. Rajpurohit, Effect of infill pattern and infill density at varying part orientation on tensile properties of fused deposition modeling-printed poly-lactic acid part, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 235 (2021) 1811–1827. doi: 10.1177%2F0954406219856383
 A. Pandzic, D. Hodzic, and A. Milovanovic, Effect of infill type and density on tensile properties of PLA material for FDM process., Ann. DAAAM Proc. 30 (2019) 0545-0554. doi: 10.2507/30th.daaam.proceedings.xxx
- Article View: 161
- PDF Download: 348