Engineering and Technology Journal

Aerodynamic Characteristics Evaluation of S-Series Airfoils

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Mechanical Engineering Dept., University of Technology-Iraq, Alsina’a street, 10066 Baghdad, Iraq.

2 R&D at Pollrich GmbH, Siegen, Germany.

Abstract

The present study utilizes the commercial software ANSYS-Fluent to explore the influence of the geometry of thick S- S-series airfoil on the near-wake region. Four different S-series airfoils, namely S809, S811, S814, and S818, were investigated at a wide range of angles of attack, which were varied from 0 degrees to 20 degrees with an increment of 2 degrees and at a Reynolds number based on chord length Re = 1x106. Analysis of the resultant data revealed that the aerodynamic performance of the S811 and S818 airfoils superseded that of the S809 and S814 airfoils. To illustrate, at the critical angle of attack, S811 and S818 were observed to possess the maximum lift and minimum drag coefficients. Furthermore, in the range of attack angles between 10 and 16 degrees, these airfoils consistently demonstrated lower drag than the others tested, enhancing overall aerodynamic performance. These findings underscore the significant role played by airfoil geometry in influencing aerodynamic performance and provide insights into optimal design parameters for wind turbine blades, particularly highlighting the advantages of the S811 and S818 airfoil shapes. In addition, the effect of the unsteady structures in the near-wake zone behind the trailing was also evaluated through turbulence kinetic energy contours. The results revealed a decrease in turbulence kinetic energy when the S811 and S818 airfoils were placed in a cross-flow compared to the S809 and S814 airfoils. This indicates that the strength of the vortex shedding of these airfoils is lower than that of the S809 and S8014 airfoils.

Graphical Abstract

Highlights

  • Ansys-Fluent predicts flow around thick airfoils wall at low/mid angles. High angles: lift, drag, near-wake
  • The airfoil shape significantly shapes the airfoil and wake region flow
  • S818, S811 airfoils performed best in crossflow while S809, S814 showed poor aerodynamics, especially at high angles

Keywords

Main Subjects

References
  1. Navigant Research, Navigant Research World Market Update 2012 Comments. Web. 08 Nov. 2013.
  2. Burton, T., Wind energy handbook, Chichester, West Sussex, Wiley, 2011.
  3. R. Ahmed, Blade sections for wind turbine and tidal current turbine applications-current status and future challenges, Int. J. Energy Res., 36 (2012) 829-844. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.2912
  4. Tangler, J. L., Somers, D. M., United States., National Renewable Energy Laboratory (U.S.), & Airfoils Incorporated. NREL airfoil families for HAWTs. Golden, Colo: National Renewable Energy Laboratory, (1995).
  5. Winnemöller and C. P. Van Dam, Design and numerical optimization of thick airfoils including blunt trailing edges, J. Aircr., 44 (2007) 232e40. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.23057
  6. Grasso, Development of thick airfoils for wind turbines, J. Aircraft, 50 (2013) 975. http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/1.C032182
  7. Schubel and R. Crossley, Wind turbine blade design review, J. Wind Eng., 36 (2012) 365e88.http://dx.doi.org/10.1260/0309-524X.36.4.365
  8. A. Timmer, R. Van Rooy, Thick airfoils for HAWTs, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 39 (1992) 151e60.https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(92)90541-H
  9. S. Selig, M. D. Maughmer, Multipoint inverse airfoil design method based on conformal mapping, AIAA J., 30 (1992)1162e70. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.11046
  10. Drela M. XFOIL, An analysis and design system for low Reynolds number airfoils[M]//Low Reynolds number aerodynamics, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1989, 1e12. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-84010-4_1
  11. Tangler J. L. and Somers D. M., NREL airfoil families for HAWTs[M]. National Renewable Energy Laboratory; 1995.
  12. A. Timmer and R. Van Rooij, Summary of the Delft University wind turbine dedicated airfoils, J. Sol. Energy Eng., 125 (2003) 488e96.https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1626129
  13. Van Rooij and W. A. Timmer, Roughness sensitivity considerations for thick rotor blade airfoils, J. Sol. energy Eng. 125 (2003) 468e78.https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1624614
  14. Van Rooij R., Modification of the boundary layer calculation in RFOIL for improved airfoil stall prediction, Report IW-96087R. The Netherlands, TUDelft, 1996.
  15. Li, K. Yang, L. Zhang,J. Bai and J. Xu, Large thickness airfoils with high lift in the operating range of angle of attack, J. Renew. Sustain Energy, 6 (2014) 033110.https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4878846
  16. Fuglsang and C. Bak, Development of the Risø wind turbine airfoils, Wind Energy, 7 (2004) 145e62.http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/we.117
  17. Tangler, J. L., Somers, D. M., United States., National Renewable Energy Laboratory (U.S.), & Airfoils Incorporated, NREL airfoil families for HAWTs. Golden, Colo: National Renewable Energy Laboratory, (1995).
  18. Wind Turbine Airfoils, Web. 23 Nov. 2013. <http://wind.nrel.gov/airfoils/>.
  19. Somers D., Design and experimental results for the S809 airfoil, NREL/SR-440-6918. Tech. Rep. NREL, 1997
  20. J. Feng, Y. Lin, G. Zhu, and X. Luo, Effect of synthetic jet parameters on flow control of an aerofoil at high Reynolds number, Sādhanā, 44 (2019) 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-019-1173-2
Engineering and Technology Journal
Volume 42, Issue 1
Mechanical Engineering
17 articles
January 2024
Page 65-77
Files
Share
Export Citation
Statistics