Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Civil Engineering Dept., University of Technology-Iraq, Alsina’a street, 10066 Baghdad, Iraq.

Abstract

Soft clayey soils present geotechnical engineering challenges with significant stability and settlement. Various methods are employed to enhance the geotechnical properties of these soils. Heating and grouting are the methods used to improve such soil. A new heating and cement grouting system using gas as a source of heating through boreholes and Portland cement for grouting was designed and manufactured to enhance the soft soil. Different parameters were investigated, including the shear strength and the angle of internal friction, as well as the water/cement ratio, W/C (0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.25, 1.5, and 1.75), and the period of curing (3, 14, and 28 days). The results showed the shear strength and angle of internal friction increased from 14 to 300 kPa and 0 to 50 degrees, respectively. If only the heating system is running, the strength and behavior of the soil will improve via heated and cement grouting with a water/cement ratio. If the w/c ratio increases from 0 to 1.25, the ultimate bearing capacity ratio (qu treated/qu untreated) increases from 6.5 to 14.3 at 15% settlement. However, when the water/cement ratio increases from 1.25 to 1.75, the ultimate bearing capacity ratio (qu treated/qu untreated) decreases from 14.3 to 11.4. The ultimate bearing capacity ratio improves with increasing curative time. It climbs from 14.3 to 19.6 during 3 to 28 days for cement grouting models, while the ultimate bearing capacity ratio grows from 6.5 to 7 during 3 to 28 days for heating process models only, at 15% settlement.

Graphical Abstract

Highlights

  • This study examines the effect of time on strength and degree of improvement of grouting material in heated, cracked soil.
  • The shear strength of the heated soil increased from 14 to 300 kPa
  • At 15% settlement ratio, bearing ratio rose from 32.9 to 71.7 as water-cement ratio increased from 0 to 1.25
  • At 15% settlement, ultimate bearing capacity ratios decreased from 14.3 to 11.4 for models with 1.25 to 1.75 water-cement ratios
  • At 15% settlement, bearing ratios for heating and 1.25 water-cement grouting were 71.70, 88.19 and 98 for different curing times

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. M. Tarsh, M. A. Al-Neami, and K. Y. H. Al-Soudany, Variation of Consistency Limits and Compaction Characteristics of Clayey Soil with Nanomaterials, J. Eng. Technol., 39 (2021) 1257–1264. https://doi.org/10.30684/etj.v39i8.1930
  2. A. M. Al-Neami, Reducing settlement of soft soils using local materials, J. Eng. Technol., 28 (2010) 6649–6661. https://doi.org/10.30684/etj.28.23.4
  3. M. Abu-Zreig, N. M. Al-Akhras, and M. F. Attom, “Influence of heat treatment on the behavior of clayey soils, Appl. Clay Sci., 20 (2001) 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-1317(01)00066-7
  4. A. M. Al-Neami., F. H .Raheel, & Y. H. Al-Ani, Behavior of Cohesive Soil Reinforced by Polypropylene Fiber, J. Eng. Technol., 38 (2020) 801–812. http://dx.doi.org/10.30684/etj.v38i6A.109
  5. Y.Fattah, M. M. Al-Ani, & M. T. A Al-Lamy, Studying collapse potential of gypseous soil treated by grouting, Soils Found., 54 (2014) 396–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2014.04.008
  6. N. Ibragimov, Characteristics of Soil Grouting by Hydro-Jet Technology, Soil Mech. Found. Eng., 50 (2013) 200-205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11204-013-9234-8
  7. H.Shareef, M. A. Al-Neami, & F. H. Rahil, Some of The Field and Laboratory Studies on Grouting Properties for Weak Soils: A Review. Int. J. Intell. Syst. Appl. Eng., 11 (2023) 131–141.
  8. Duan, Z. Jiang, S. Zhu, P. Yao, and Q. Sun, “New composite grouting materials: Modified urea–formaldehyde resin with cement, Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol., 22 (2012) 195–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2011.08.009
  9. Faramarzi, A. Rasti, and S. M. Abtahi, “An experimental study of the effect of cement and chemical grouting on the improvement of the mechanical and hydraulic properties of alluvial formations, Constr. Build. Mater., 126 (2016) 32–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.09.006
  10. Varol and S. Dalgıç, “Grouting applications in the Istanbul metro, Turkey. Tunnelling Underground Space Technol., 21 (2006) 602–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2005.11.002.
  11. El Tani, Grouting rock fractures with cement grout, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 45 (2012) 547–561. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00603-012-0235-0
  12. Funehag and G. Gustafson, Design of grouting with silica sol in hard rock–New methods for calculation of penetration length, Part I. Tunnelling Underground Space Technol., 23 (2008) 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2006.12.005
  13. S. Liu, C. B. Lu, B. Liu, and X. L. Lu, Research on rheological behavior for cement grout considering temperature and hydration time effects, Chin. J. Rock Mech. Eng, 33 (2014) 3730–3740. http://dx.doi.org/10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2014.s2.042
  14. Zhong-Miao, Z. O. U. Jian, H. E. Jing-Yi, and W. Hua-qiang, Laboratory tests on compaction grouting and fracture grouting of clay, Chin. J. Geotech. Eng., 31(2009) 1818–1824.
  15. F. Huang, X. G. Li, X. Guo, and K. Atsushi, “Hydraulic fracture extending during slurry shield tunneling in cohesive soil,” Yantu Gongcheng Xuebao/ Chin. J. Geotech. Eng., 32 (2010) 712–717.
  16. M. Das, Principles of geotechnical engineering. Cengage learning, 2021.