Document Type : Review Paper

Authors

1 Mechanical Engineering Dept., University of Technology-Iraq, Alsina’a street, 10066 Baghdad, Iraq.

2 Control and Systems Engineering Dept., University of Technology-Iraq, Alsina’a street, 10066 Baghdad, Iraq.

3 Mechanical Engineering Dept., Faculty of Engineering, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafrelsheikh, Egypt.

Abstract

This comprehensive research paper reviews the latest techniques to enhance the productivity of double-slope solar stills by providing quantitative data on key research outcomes. With the global water scarcity crisis and the need for effective desalination technology, this study focuses on solar-based desalination techniques and their specific application in double-slope solar stills. This paper offers a comprehensive and quantitative analysis of heat addition methods in double-slope solar stills by examining published research findings, providing valuable insights for researchers and practitioners. The study reveals significant improvements in productivity through various modifications. Evaporation enhancement, heat transfer enhancement, and condensation enhancement have proven to be highly effective, resulting in substantial increases in water production. The use of thermoelectric modules in double-slope solar stills has shown a remarkable 250% increase in water production by heating the water in the basin, which enhances evaporation rates and condensation on the glass cover. Moreover, the integration of Evacuated Tube Collectors (ETCs) has demonstrated a notable improvement in double-slope solar stills' life cycle conversion efficiency. The system incorporating ETCs achieved an impressive 59.42% higher efficiency than a system without ETCs, primarily due to the enhanced thermal input provided by ETCs to the solar still's basin. Another significant finding is the six-fold increase in water production achieved by implementing the double-slope solar still with a PV heater (CSSPVH) compared to conventional solar stills (CSS). This substantial improvement positions the CSSPVH design as a highly efficient solution for long-term potable water generation. Furthermore, adding a water heater to the base tank of a solar still has been found to raise water temperature quickly, resulting in a significant boost in production by approximately 370%. However, it is important to note that productivity decreases with increasing wind speed. Even with an outer cooling fan to cool the solar still's glass surface, productivity is reduced by 4% and 8% for wind speeds of 7 m/s and 9 m/s, respectively.

Graphical Abstract

Highlights

  • Enhanced modifications were made to double-slope solar stills to raise water output significantly.
  • Solar stills are suitable for various climates, including hot and humid ones.
  • Thermoelectric modules led to 1032.5 L/m2.year water production increase.
  • Evacuated Tube Collectors (ETCs) and multi-scale heat exchangers substantially improved efficiency.

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. A. Hammood, et al., Effects of Magnetic Field on the Performance of Solar Distillers: A Review Study, Eng. Technol. J., 41 (2022) 121-131. http://doi.org/10.30684/etj.2022.134576.1240
  2. M. Manokar, et al., Review of different methods employed in pyramidal solar still desalination to augment the yield of freshwater, Desalin. Water Treat., 136 (2018) 20-30. http://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2018.23188
  3. Kabeel, A., et al., A comprehensive review of tubular solar still designs, performance, and economic analysis, J. Cleaner Prod., 246 (2020) 119030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119030
  4. A. El-Sebaii, et al., Effect of fin configuration parameters on single basin solar still performance. Desalination, 365 (2015) 15-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2015.02.002
  5. A. Hammoodi, et al., Pyramid solar distillers: A comprehensive review of recent techniques, Results Eng., 18 (2023) 101157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2023.101157
  6. J. Gnanaraj and V. V. Velmurugan, Experimental investigation on the performance of modified single basin double slope solar stills, Int. J. Ambient Energy, 43 (2022) 206-215. https://doi.org/10.1080/01430750.2019.1636861
  7. D.W. Rufuss, et al., Solar stills: A comprehensive review of designs, performance and material advances, Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 63 (2016) 464-496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.068
  8. A. Hammoodi, et al., A detailed review of the factors impacting pyramid type solar still performance, Alexandria Eng. J., 66 (2023) 123-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2022.12.006
  9. Badran, Theoretical analysis of solar distillation using active solar still, Int. J. Therm. Environ. Eng., 3 (2011) 113-120.http://dx.doi.org/10.5383/ijtee.03.02.009
  10. Shokri and MS Fard, Techno-economic assessment of water desalination: Future outlooks and challenges, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 169 (2023) 564-578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2022.11.007
  11. Sangeetha, et al., A review on PCM and nanofluid for various productivity enhancement methods for double slope solar still: Future challenge and current water issues, Desalination, 551 (2023) 116367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2022.116367
  12. Agrawal, et al., Augmenting the productivity of double slope solar still by incorporating sensible and latent heat storage materials, Int. J. Ambient Energy , 44 (2023) 616-625. https://doi.org/10.1080/01430750.2022.2140192
  13. W. Sharshir, et al., Performance enhancement of stepped double slope solar still by using nanoparticles and linen wicks: energy, exergy and economic analysis, Appl. Therm. Eng., 174 (2020) 115278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.115278
  14. Mohan, et al., A review on solar still: a simple desalination technology to obtain potable water, Int. J. Ambient Energy, 40 (2019) 335-342. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01430750.2017.1393776
  15. Panchal, et al., Various techniques to enhance distillate output of tubular solar still: a review, Groundwater Sustainable Dev., 9 (2019) 100268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2019.100268
  16. K. Singh, et al., Water purification using solar still with/without nano-fluid: a review, Mater. Today: Proc., 21 (2020). 1700-1706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.12.025
  17. Prakash and V. Velmurugan, Parameters influencing the productivity of solar stills–A review, Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 49 (2015) 585-609.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.136
  18. H. Alawee, Improving the productivity of single effect double slope solar still by modification simple, J. Eng., 21 (2015) 50-60. https://doi.org/10.31026/j.eng.2015.08.13
  19. Z. Al-Garni, Enhancing the solar still using immersion type water heater productivity and the effect of external cooling fan in winter, Appl. Sol. Energy, 48 (2012) 193-200. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0003701X12030048
  20. Dubey and D.R. Mishra, Experimental evaluation of double slope solar still augmented with ferrite ring magnets and a black cotton cloth, Int. J. Ambient Energy, 43 (2022) 1751-1762. https://doi.org/10.1080/01430750.2020.1722746
  21. Rajaseenivasan, K. Kalidasa Murugavel and T. Elango, Performance and exergy analysis of a double-basin solar still with different materials in basin, Desalin, Water Treat., 55 (2015) 1786-1794. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2014.928800
  22. Zhang, et al., Application of solar energy in water treatment processes: A review, Desalination, 428 (2018) 116-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2017.11.020
  23. M. Manokar, K.K. Murugavel and G. Esakkimuthu, Different parameters affecting the rate of evaporation and condensation on passive solar still–A review, Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 38 (2014) 309-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.05.092
  24. Dubey, S. Singh, and S. Tyagi, Advances in design and performance of dual slope solar still: A review, Solar Energy, 244 (2022) 189-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2022.08.050
  25. Durkaieswaran and K.K. Murugavel, Various special designs of single basin passive solar still–A review, Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 49 (2015) 1048-1060.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.111
  26. Sampathkumar et al., Active solar distillation—A detailed review, Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 14 (2010) 1503-1526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.01.023
  27. Babalola, A. Boyo, and R. Kesinro, Effect of Water Depth and Temperature on the Productivity of a Double Slope Solar Still', J. Energy Nat. Resour., 4 (2015) 1-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.11648/j.jenr.20150401.11
  28. Arunkumar, H.W. Lim, and S.J. Lee, A review on efficiently integrated passive distillation systems for active solar steam evaporation, Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 155 (2022) 111894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111894
  29. Qadir, et al., Non-conventional water resources and opportunities for water augmentation to achieve food security in water scarce countries, Agric. Water Manage., 87 (2007) 2-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2006.03.018
  30. H. AL-Zaedy, Experimental study on enhancement of single-basin solar still using dye solutions, Eng. Technol. J., 30 (2012) 3112-3125. https://doi.org/10.30684/etj.30.18.1
  31. M. Manokar, et al., Integrated PV/T solar still-A mini-review, Desalination, 435 (2018) 259-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2017.04.022
  32. Kalaivani and S. Radhakrishnan, Heat mass transfer and thermophysical analysis for pyramid type solar still, Int. J. Sci. Res., 2 (2013) 181-184.
  33. M. El-Nashar, Seasonal effect of dust deposition on a field of evacuated tube collectors on the performance of a solar desalination plant, Desalination, 239 (2009) 66-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2008.03.007
  34. Organization, WH, The World health report: 2004: changing history, 2004: World Health Organization.
  35. F. Mashaly, et al., Predictive model for assessing and optimizing solar still performance using artificial neural network under hyper arid environment, Solar Energy, 118 (2015) 41-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2015.05.013
  36. N. Tiwari, and L. Sahota, Advanced solar-distillation systems: basic principles, thermal modeling, and its application, Springer, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4672-8
  37. Karrabi, Removal of nitrate from contaminated groundwater using solar membrane distillation, Eng. Technol. J., Part C, 37 (2019) 327-332 . https://doi.org/10.30684/etj.37.3C.4
  38. T. Ahmed, Physical and Chemical Characteristics Comparison of the Drinking Water and Water Produced from the Conventional and Modification Solar Water Distillery, Eng. Technol. J., Part A, 37 (2019) 214-221. . https://doi.org/10.30684/etj.37.6A.5
  39. Gnanaraj, J. Patrick and M. Annaamalai, Enhancing solar still productivity by optimizing operational parameters, Desalin. Water Treat., 254 (2022) 1-14. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2022.28287
  40. Abdullah, et al., Performance evaluation of a humidification–dehumidification unit integrated with wick solar stills under different operating conditions, Desalination, 441 (2018) 52-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2018.04.024
  41. Farge, K. Sultan, and A. Ahmed, Experimental study of the performance water distillation device by using solar energy, Eng.Technol. J., Part A, 35 (2017) 653-659. http://dx.doi.org/10.30684/etj.35.6A.14
  42. A. Hammoodi, et al., Enhancement of Pyramid Solar Still Productivity Through Wick Material and Reflective Applications in Iraqi Conditions, Math. Modell. Eng. Probl., 10 (2023) 1548-1556 . https://doi.org/10.18280/mmep.100506
  43. A. Hammoodi, et al., Experimental study on pyramid solar distiller performance with applying magnet field under various operating conditions, Energy Sources Part A, 45 (2023) 11410-11423. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2023.2258081
  44. Radwan A. Hassanain, and M. Abu-Zeid, Single slope solar still for sea water distillation, World Appl. Sci. J., 7 (2009) 485-497. http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.35804.59525
  45. S. Islam, et al., Desalination technologies for developing countries: a review, J. Sci. Res., 10 (2018) 77-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/jsr.v10i1.33179
  46. Manju, and N. Sagar, Renewable energy integrated desalination: A sustainable solution to overcome future fresh-water scarcity in India, Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 73 (2017) 594-609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.164
  47. Ullah and M.G. Rasul, Recent developments in solar thermal desalination technologies: a review, Energies, 12 (2018) 119.https://doi.org/10.3390/en12010119
  48. Zarzo and D. Prats, Desalination and energy consumption, What can we expect in the near future?, Desalination, 427 (2018) 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2017.10.046
  49. Hoff, Global water resources and their management, Curr. Res. Environ. Sustainability, 1 (2009) 141-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2009.10.001
  50. Giwa, et al., Brine management methods: Recent innovations and current status, Desalination, 407 (2017) 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2016.12.008
  51. Al-Madhhachi, G. F. Smaisim, Experimental and numerical investigations with environmental impacts of affordable square pyramid solar still, Solar Energy, 216 ) 2021 ( 314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.12.051
  52. A. Al-Obaidi, et al., Evaluation of Solar Energy Powered Seawater Desalination Processes: A Review, Energies,15 )2022 ( 6562. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15186562
  53. A. Abdelkareem, et al., Recent progress in the use of renewable energy sources to power water desalination plants, Desalination, 435 )2018( 97-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2017.11.018
  54. Aende, J. Gardy, A. Hassanpour, Seawater desalination: A review of forward osmosis technique, its challenges, and future prospects, Processes, 8 )2020 (901. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8080901
  55. A. Hammoodi, et al., A detailed review of the factors impacting pyramid type solar still performance, Alex. Eng. J., 66 (2023) 123-154 .http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2022.12.006
  56. M. Hussen, et al., An experimental comparison study between four different designs of solar stills, Case Stud. Therm. Eng., 44 (2023)102841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2023.102841
  57. Abdullah, Z. Omara, An Experimental Comparison Study between Four Different Designs of Solar Stills, Avail SSRN, (2022) 4071717. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4071717
  58. Youshanlouei, S. Motlagh, H. Soltanipour, The effect of magnetic field on the performance improvement of a conventional solar still: a numerical study, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 28 (2021) 31778-31791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12947-1
  59. Sathyamurthy, et al., Factors affecting the performance of triangular pyramid solar still, Desalination., 344 (2014) 383-390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2014.04.005
  60. Singh, et al., Active solar distillation technology: a wide overview, Desalination, 493 (2020) 114652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2020.114652
  61. Muftah, et al., Factors affecting basin type solar still productivity: A detailed review, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 32 (2014) 430-447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.12.052
  62. El-Sebaii, Effect of wind speed on active and passive solar stills, Energy Convers. Manag., 45 (2004) 1187-1204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2003.09.036
  63. Kabeel, Z. Omara, M. Younes, Techniques used to improve the performance of the stepped solar still—A review, Renew. Sustain. Energy. Rev., 46 (2015)178-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.053
  64. Keshtkar, M. Eslami, K. Jafarpur, Effect of design parameters on performance of passive basin solar stills considering instantaneous ambient conditions: a transient CFD modeling, Solar Energy, 201 (2020) 884-907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.03.068
  65. V. Modi, et al., Impact of orientation and water depth on productivity of single-basin dual-slope solar still with Al2O3 and CuO nanoparticles, J. Therm. Anal. Calorim., 143 (2021) 899-913. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-09351-1
  66. Jin, et al., Numerical investigation of heat transfer enhancement in a solar air heater roughened by multiple V-shaped ribs, Renew. Energy., 134 (2019) 78-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.11.016
  67. Tripathi, G. Tiwari, Effect of size and material of a semi-cylindrical condensing cover on heat and mass transfer for distillation, Desalination, 166 (2004) 231-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2004.06.078
  68. Singh. G. Tiwari, Analytical characteristic equation of N identical evacuated tubular collectors integrated double slope solar still, J. Sol. Energy. Eng., 139 (2017) 69. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4036855
  69. Sharma, S.K., et al., Energy metrics and efficiency analyses of double slope solar distiller unit ‎augmented with N identical parabolic concentrator integrated evacuated tubular collectors: a ‎comparative study. Desalination and Water Treatment, 195(2020) 40-56. https://doi: 10.5004/dwt.2020.25919
  70. Bait, Exergy, environ–economic and economic analyses of a tubular solar water heater assisted solar still, J. Clean. Prod., 212 (2019 ) 630-646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.015
  71. Elgendi, A. Kabeel, F. Essa, Improving the solar still productivity using thermoelectric materials: A review, Alex. Eng. J., 65 (2023) 963-982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2022.10.011
  72. Shoeibi, et al., Application of simultaneous thermoelectric cooling and heating to improve the performance of a solar still: an experimental study and exergy analysis, Appl. Energy, 263 (2020) 114581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114581
  73. Dehghan, A. Afshari, N. Rahbar, Thermal modeling and exergetic analysis of a thermoelectric assisted solar still, Solar Energy, 115 (2015) 277-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2015.02.038
  74. Rahbar, A. Gharaiian, S. Rashidi, Exergy and economic analysis for a double slope solar still equipped by thermoelectric heating modules-an experimental investigation, Desalination, 420 (2017)106-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2017.07.005
  75. A .Krishna, K. Ritwin, S. Tiwari, Performance analysis based on energy and exergy output of double slope passive and active solar still, Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy., 42 (2023) e13949. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.13949
  76. Riahi, et al., Sustainable potable water production using a solar still with photovoltaic modules-AC heater, Desalin. Water Treat., 57(2016)14929-14944. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2015.1070285
  77. Al-Garni, Productivity enhancement of solar still using water heater and cooling fan, J. Sol. Energy Eng. Aug., 134 (2012) 031006 . http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.4005760
  78. Al-Hamadani, A. Yaseen, Experimental Study of Multi Effect stages PV Panels Solar Still to Enhance the Productivity by Utilizing Water Heater and Cooling Fan, J. Univ. Babylon Eng. Sci., 27 (2019) 275-286.
  79. Bait, M. SI-Ameur, A. Benmoussa, Numerical Approach of a Double Slope Solar Still Combined with a Cylindrical Solar Water Heater: Mass and Heat Energy Balance Mathematical Model, J. Polytechnic ., 18 (2015) 227-234.
  80. Alawee, H. Dhahad, T. Mohamed, An Experimental study on improving the performance of a double slope solar still, Int. Conf. Sustain. Agric. Energy Ind. Reg. Global Context, 2015.
  81. Dhivagar, et al., Performance analysis of solar desalination using crushed granite stone as an energy storage material and the integration of solar district heating, Energy Sources A: Recov. Util. Environ. Eff., 46 (2024) 1370-1388. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2023.2299693
  82. Al-Hayeka, O. Badran, The effect of using different designs of solar stills on water distillation, Desalination, 169 (2004)121-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2004.08.013
  83. Sonker, et al., Solar distillation using three different phase change materials stored in a copper cylinder, Energy Rep., 5 (2019)1532-1542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2019.10.023
  84. El-Sebaey, et al., Experimental study with thermal and economical analysis for some modifications on cylindrical sector and double slope, single basin solar still, Case Stud. Therm. Eng., 49 (2023) 103310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2023.103310
  85. Abdullah, et al., Enhancing a solar still's performance by preheating the feed water and employing phase-change material, Alex. Eng. J., 77 (2023 ) 395-405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2023.07.002
  86. Afolabi, et al., Experimental investigation of double slope solar still integrated with PCM nanoadditives microencapsulated thermal energy storage, Desalination, 553 (2023)116477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2023.116477
  87. Shajahan, et al., Evaluation of efficiency of double slope solar still and drinking water yield using silver nanoparticle mixed with phase change material, Energy Sources A: Recovery, Util. Environ. Eff., 44 (2022)8679-8693. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2022.2120572
  88. Samuel, et al., Design and Investigation of an Effective Solar Still Applicable to Remote Islands, Water, 14 (2022) 703. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14050703
  89. Alawee, et al., Utilizing the dangled jute cords, reflectors, and condensation cycle to improve the double sloped distiller performance, Solar Energy, 267 (2024)112237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2023.112237
  90. Chaichan, et al., Advanced techniques for enhancing solar distiller productivity: a review, Energy Sources A: Recovery Util. Environ. Eff., 46 (2024)736-772. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2023.2289559
  91. Pal, et al., Performance analysis of modified basin type double slope multi–wick solar still, Desalination, 422 (2017) 68-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2017.08.009
  92. Bhargva, et al., Productivity Augmentation of a Solar Still with Rectangular Fins and Bamboo Cotton Wick, J. Sol. Energy Res ., 8 (2023)1410-1416.
  93. Al-Qadami, et al., Yield efficiency evaluation of double slope solar stills connected with external spiral copper for potable water production, J. Ecol. Eng., 20 (2019) 176-186. https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/108654
  94. Al-Qadami, et al., Productivity enhancement of a double slope solar still coupled with a solar system, J. Ecol. Eng., 21 (2020) 255-263. https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/118293
  95. Morad, H. El-Maghawry, K. Wasfy, Improving the double slope solar still performance by using flat-plate solar collector and cooling glass cover, Desalination, 373 (2015) 1- 9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2015.06.017
  96. Hassan, M. Ahmed, M. Fathy, Experimental work on the effect of saline water medium on the performance of solar still with tracked parabolic trough collector (TPTC), Renew. Energy, 135 (2019)136-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.11.112
  97. Baspineiro, J. Franco, V. Flexer, Performance of a double-slope solar still for the concentration of lithium rich brines with concomitant fresh water recovery, Sci. Total Environ., 791 (2021)148192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148192
  98. Sahota, G. Tiwari, Analytical characteristic equation of nanofluid loaded active double slope solar still coupled with helically coiled heat exchanger, Energy Conv. Manag., 135 (2017) 308-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.12.078
  99. Maurya, et al., Use of absorber plate built of ZnO/PVC/Bioactivation modified epoxy nanocomposites to improvement of double-effect Solar Distiller productivity analyzing the Energy, Exergo-environment and Enviro-economical, J. Clean. Prod., 434 (2024)139601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139601
  100. Delyannis, A. Delyannis, Economics of solar stills, Desalination, 52 (1985 )167-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-9164(85)85006-2
  101. Abdullah, et al., Utilizing a single slope solar still with copper heating coil, external condenser, phase change material, along with internal and external reflectors—experimental study, J. Energy Storage,63(2023)106899. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2023.106899
  102. Habib, et al., Carbon nanotubes/paraffin wax nanocomposite for improving the performance of a solar air heating system, Therm. Sci. Eng. Prog., 23 (2021)100877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2021.100877
  103. Attia, et al., Phosphate bed as energy storage materials for augmentation of conventional solar still productivity, Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy., 40 (2021) e13581. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.13581
  104. Alkaisi, R. Mossad, A. Barforoush, A review of the water desalination systems integrated with renewable energy, Energy Proc., 110 (2017) 268-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.138